Performance vs size
What is the minimal model size that meets task accuracy? Benchmark vs GPT-class and Mixtral on domain tasks.
Design and validate on-device language model systems that meet accuracy, latency, memory, and safety constraints under real-world edge deployment. This is an active, early-stage program — see the roadmap below for what's shipped vs. planned, and our benchmarks methodology for exactly how current performance figures are derived.
What is the minimal model size that meets task accuracy? Benchmark vs GPT-class and Mixtral on domain tasks.
Quantization (4/8-bit), LoRA/QLoRA fine-tuning, sparse and MoE-lite architectures for edge efficiency.
Latency, memory, and energy efficiency — critical for mobile and automotive deployment paths.
Hallucination rate measurement, deterministic fallbacks, guardrails for sensitive actions.
Performance gain from private data augmentation vs model-only inference; retrieval accuracy studies.
Lightweight architectures for automotive damage detection, cabin monitoring, and industrial inspection.
Research milestones feeding product configuration and guardrails.
Latency and accuracy matrix across Pi, Jetson, and mini PC SKUs — published into hardware configurator.
Retrieval eval harness, reranker selection, and citation UX patterns for regulated domains.
Intent validation library, red-team results, and OEM knowledge base templates.
| Research output | Implementation impact |
|---|---|
| Model benchmarks | Hardware SKU mapping & model selection |
| Latency measurements | Device requirements in configurator |
| Safety evaluation | Guardrails & UX constraints |
| RAG experiments | Production retrieval pipeline |
| Optimization techniques | Final inference configuration |
We haven't published a formal paper or whitepaper yet — the program is still early. As the Q3 2026 edge benchmark suite and Q4 2026 RAG evaluation harness (above) produce results, we'll publish methodology and findings here rather than only marketing claims.